Expandi vs Waalaxy
 Expandi |  Waalaxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Sentiment | ||
| Score | 23/100 | 35/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 | #6 |
| Rated comments | 16 | 9 |
| Best for | Small teams that want conditional LinkedIn sequences and a shared workspace; Users who need more workflow depth than basic sequence tools | Small, conservative LinkedIn sequences run well under daily limits; Quick, short-lived LinkedIn campaigns |
| Skip it if | Agencies running many LinkedIn profiles on a tight per-seat budget; Teams that want email and LinkedIn equally strong in one sequence | Always-on LinkedIn outreach you need to rely on long term; Anyone who can't risk restrictions on their main LinkedIn account |
| Starting price | $79/seat/mo | £17/mo |
| Pricing (vendor-stated) | Business plan $99 per seat per month billed monthly, or $79/mo billed annually; Agency plan (10+ seats) is custom. 7-day free trial with all features; no free plan. | Shown in GBP for a UK visitor: Pro £34, Advanced £69, Business £104 per user/mo billed monthly; £17, £35 and £52 per user/mo billed yearly (quarterly billing in between). 14-day free trial on every plan; no free plan listed. LinkedIn Inbox is a paid add-on. |
Of 100 comments, only 16 carry a first-hand or clear opinion, so independent discussion is still fairly thin; 41 were promotional, mostly plugs for rival tools (Kakiyo, SalesRobot, Bearconnect, FlowKon, SalesNext, Snov.io), repeated Pulse for Reddit, Prospeo and ProspectZero seeding, and affiliate or referral links, and other users flag an r/sales post as a pitch from Expandi's own team. Users who rate it credit its conditional sequences, shared team workspace and depth, and some run it without being flagged at reasonable limits. The recurring complaints are price at about $99 per seat, setup and dashboard complexity, weak scaling across many profiles and an email side that feels bolted on, plus some users who moved away over cloud-tool restriction risk.
Users like
- Conditional sequences route accepted, replied and silent prospects automatically, and a shared workspace shows who is working which accounts; one team cut its daily LinkedIn routine from 45 to 20 minutes[1][2]
- Has more workflow depth than lighter alternatives, which users describe as a solid, feature-rich tool[1][2][3]
- Users who keep daily limits low and vary messaging report no flags so far[1][2]
- Reliable for booking meetings, including sending from executives' accounts[1][2]
Users complain about
- About $99 to $100 per seat is called steep, and the cost climbs noticeably as seats are added[1][2][3][4]
- Setup is heavy: the dashboard took a while to learn, and one team's SDRs spent more time configuring sequences than selling[1][2][3]
- Does not scale well across many profiles, and the email side feels like an afterthought in sequence logic[1][2][3]
- Some users see restriction risk in its cloud approach: one client moved to a desktop tool over IP mismatches, another expects LinkedIn to shut such tools down[1][2]
Independent discussion is thin: of 100 comments only 9 are non-promotional opinions. Those few say Waalaxy works when you ramp up slowly and keep daily limits low, but account suspensions are the recurring worry, and one experienced user found it fine for quick campaigns yet not reliable long term. Most of the rest is marketing: affiliate links, a burst of short, generic praise across a handful of threads in July and August 2025 (two of them word-for-word identical), and many comments that name Waalaxy only to pitch a competitor.
Users like
- One user booked about twice as many meetings from Waalaxy LinkedIn campaigns as from Apollo email (roughly 10 vs 5 a month), and the campaigns ran largely on their own once set up[1]
- Users who ramp volume gradually and keep daily caps low report no account problems[1][2]
- Campaign stats are detailed enough to see what to improve[1]
- Fine for quick, short LinkedIn campaigns[1]