Otterly.ai vs Peec AI
 Otterly.ai |  Peec AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Sentiment | ||
| Score | 21/100 | 13/100 |
| Rank in category | Unranked (under 8 rated comments) | Unranked (under 8 rated comments) |
| Rated comments | 3 | 3 |
| Best for | Teams that want a self-serve AI visibility tracker to trial without a sales process | SEO and content teams that want a straightforward first tracker for brand visibility in AI answers; Teams that want to compare their AI-answer visibility against named competitors over time |
| Skip it if | Anyone who needs AI share-of-voice figures they can report as precise numbers | Buyers who want a single source of truth without manual spot checks; Teams tracking a large prompt set on a tight budget |
| Starting price | $29/mo | €85/mo |
| Pricing (vendor-stated) | From $29/mo (Lite, 15 search prompts) billed monthly, or $25/mo billed annually; Standard $189/mo (100 prompts), Premium $489/mo (400 prompts), Enterprise custom from 1,000 prompts. Free trial for new users; no free plan. | Starter €85/mo (50 prompts, 3 models, 1 project), Pro €205/mo (150 prompts, 2 projects) and Advanced €425/mo (350 prompts, 5 projects), all with unlimited users and daily tracking, shown at monthly prices; annual billing is 15% cheaper. Extra models are a paid add-on. Enterprise is custom, billed annually, with API access and SSO. The page offers a free trial but states no length; no free plan. |
Independent discussion is very thin: 11 of the 15 Reddit comments mentioning Otterly were promotional, mostly accounts name-dropping it before plugging a lesser-known AI visibility tool (including two identical comments from different accounts), and only three non-promotional comments carry an opinion. Those few treat it as a reasonable self-serve option, one shortlisted after its team judged Profound overpriced. The most upvoted comment questions the whole category: visibility percentages come from repeatedly asking models a fixed set of prompts, so they shift between runs and say nothing about real prompt volume.
Users like
Users complain about
- Its visibility percentages come from asking AI models the same typed prompts over and over; answers change between runs and wordings and real prompt volume is unknown, so one user argues the share figures are unreliable (a critique aimed at the category, naming Semrush too)[1]
Independent discussion is very thin: only three non-promotional comments give a real opinion of Peec, so treat any conclusion as tentative. Ten of the 16 comments were promotional, mostly accounts naming Peec as the 'simple starting point' before plugging their own tracker, plus one comment from a Peec employee and two identical copies of the same plug. Of the genuine users, one says it is much better than anything else they tried and another says its competitor comparison caught visibility dips early but should be paired with manual checks and Ahrefs; a third found a rival tool cheaper at scale.
Users like
- Users who run it rate it highly: one says it is much better than anything else they tried, another that its competitor comparison helped them spot visibility dips before they hit traffic[1][2]
- One user after a few weeks of use says it showed which pages were trending up even while Google Search Console data was lagging[1]