Dripify vs Waalaxy
 Dripify |  Waalaxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Sentiment | ||
| Score | 47/100 | 35/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 | #6 |
| Rated comments | 16 | 9 |
| Best for | Solo users and early-stage teams running simple LinkedIn connection and follow-up sequences; Founders sending outreach from one executive's LinkedIn account | Small, conservative LinkedIn sequences run well under daily limits; Quick, short-lived LinkedIn campaigns |
| Skip it if | Teams that need conditional branching or advanced sequence logic; Teams running many LinkedIn accounts in parallel | Always-on LinkedIn outreach you need to rely on long term; Anyone who can't risk restrictions on their main LinkedIn account |
| Starting price | $59/user/mo | £17/mo |
| Pricing (vendor-stated) | Pro $79 per user per month billed monthly ($59 billed annually); Advanced $99/mo ($79 annually); Enterprise custom. Each seat connects one LinkedIn account. 7-day free trial with no credit card; no free plan. | Shown in GBP for a UK visitor: Pro £34, Advanced £69, Business £104 per user/mo billed monthly; £17, £35 and £52 per user/mo billed yearly (quarterly billing in between). 14-day free trial on every plan; no free plan listed. LinkedIn Inbox is a paid add-on. |
More than half the corpus is promotional: 55 of 100 comments, including a coordinated burst from August to October 2026 in which many accounts post near-identical praise in vendor vocabulary (the same 'I've used Dripify as a LinkedIn automation tool' framing, sequence builder, team dashboard, email steps and pace control, two posts almost word for word), plus plugs for rival tools such as Botdog, ZenMode, Sendroq, OutFlo, Snov.io and Airscale. Only 16 independent comments carry an opinion, so discussion is thin; those users find it easy to set up for simple LinkedIn sequences, report meetings from it and some say they ran it for a long time without warnings. The trade-off is depth: several call it basic or rigid once you need conditional branching or heavier team workflows, and one got better results from Expandi.
Users like
- Easy to set up, with a clean interface and campaigns that keep running when the LinkedIn tab is closed[1][2][3][4]
- Users report booking meetings with it, such as 9 meetings in two weeks from a CEO's account[1][2][3][4]
- Several users say daily limits and delays kept their accounts safe; one never got a LinkedIn warning in a year on Dripify but got one soon after switching to a cheaper tool[1][2][3][4]
Users complain about
- Limited depth: sequences are rigid for conditional branches and feel basic for advanced logic or heavy team workflows, and one user got better results from Expandi[1][2][3][4]
- One user reports messages set to send together go out 10 to 20 minutes apart[1]
- A former user says that without heavy customization it is just a spamming utility, and moved to custom workflows[1]
Independent discussion is thin: of 100 comments only 9 are non-promotional opinions. Those few say Waalaxy works when you ramp up slowly and keep daily limits low, but account suspensions are the recurring worry, and one experienced user found it fine for quick campaigns yet not reliable long term. Most of the rest is marketing: affiliate links, a burst of short, generic praise across a handful of threads in July and August 2025 (two of them word-for-word identical), and many comments that name Waalaxy only to pitch a competitor.
Users like
- One user booked about twice as many meetings from Waalaxy LinkedIn campaigns as from Apollo email (roughly 10 vs 5 a month), and the campaigns ran largely on their own once set up[1]
- Users who ramp volume gradually and keep daily caps low report no account problems[1][2]
- Campaign stats are detailed enough to see what to improve[1]
- Fine for quick, short LinkedIn campaigns[1]