# LeadMagic vs Seamless.AI

Updated 2026-10-15. Compared from independent Reddit comments only. Methodology: https://gtmranked.com/methodology/

**Is LeadMagic or Seamless.AI better?** Independent users prefer LeadMagic (68/100 from 21 rated comments) over Seamless.AI (13/100 from 17 rated comments). LeadMagic is best for Budget teams running their own enrichment waterfall; Seamless.AI is best for Budget-conscious reps who want a cheaper alternative to ZoomInfo and will verify data themselves.

**Is LeadMagic or Seamless.AI cheaper?** LeadMagic: Essential is $99/mo billed monthly for 5,000 credits, or $990/yr (about $83/mo); tiers run up to Ultimate at $849/mo for 100,000 credits, with Enterprise from $2,490/quarter. No free plan or free credits; a paid plan is required at signup, and failed lookups cost nothing. Seamless.AI: Sales-led pricing; no public plan prices. The pricing page asks how many contacts you need per month and your company size before quoting, and offers free sign-up and competitor switch discounts. Prices are from each vendor's pricing page and change often.

| | LeadMagic | Seamless.AI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 13/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 | #14 |
| Rated comments | 21 | 17 |
| Best for | Budget teams running their own enrichment waterfall; Finding work emails and mobiles for contacts scraped from Apollo or LinkedIn; A second-pass check on unknown or failed emails | Budget-conscious reps who want a cheaper alternative to ZoomInfo and will verify data themselves |
| Starting price | $83/mo | Custom pricing |

## #1 LeadMagic

LeadMagic sells verified B2B contact and company data, including work emails, email validation and mobile numbers, through an app, API, CLI and MCP server that draw on one shared credit pool. Website: leadmagic.io. Category: [B2B Data & Enrichment](https://gtmranked.com/best/b2b-data-enrichment/). Score 68/100 (18 positive, 1 mixed, 2 negative of 21 independent comments).

**Verdict:** Independent users describe LeadMagic as a cheap, pay-as-you-go email and mobile finder that slots into a waterfall, usually alongside Apollo or inside Clay, and that also works as a second-pass verifier. About 21 non-promotional comments carry an opinion, mostly brief and positive, centred on price and on finding emails and phones Apollo misses. The criticism is thinner but specific: one user says it has been failing them lately, and its handling of catch-all addresses is contested, with one user calling its 'valid catch-all' results unreliable and another praising its catch-all marking. Promotional comments are a smaller share than for most tools here, mostly plugs for other scrapers and verifiers plus a same-day cluster of Prospeo plugs, one of which knocks its mobile numbers.

**What users like:**
- Cheap and pay-as-you-go; users call it the low-cost option for volume, one putting it at a tenth of Apollo's cost [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/b2bmarketing/comments/1vfjjaq/_/p1qkvxy/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1l3tk3b/_/mwjuxsq/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/1i3mzs0/_/m8edysy/) [4](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/1khzwhh/_/mrb450g/)
- Finds emails other sources miss, such as a contact's new address after a job change when Apollo still had the old one [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1qq6vlu/_/o3l2d1u/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/LeadGeneration/comments/1k4bcll/_/mogv1i6/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1juuhec/_/mnkcour/)
- Used for mobile numbers too, with users reporting better mobile coverage than Apollo [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/salesdevelopment/comments/1hwe6np/_/m60z2p9/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/LeadGeneration/comments/1jx9yi1/_/mnha5sa/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaaS/comments/1eftatb/_/lfs1x9m/)
- Doubles as a verifier: users run it as a second pass on unknown emails, then use its finder to replace invalid ones [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/b2bmarketing/comments/1v8vyp3/_/p128ive/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1heeei7/_/m230nqt/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1juuhec/_/mnkcour/)
- Plugs easily into Clay and other waterfall setups for LinkedIn-sourced contacts [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1qq6vlu/_/o3l2d1u/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1rl8ljj/_/obzdqu4/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1o4u2vi/_/njhbovf/)

**What users complain about:**
- One user says it charges for 'valid catch-all' results that are not reliable, forcing either lower coverage or a separate catch-all verifier (another user disputes this and praises its catch-all marking) [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/LeadGeneration/comments/1k4bcll/_/momkk72/)
- Consistency is questioned: one user says it has been failing them recently [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1pfmgrr/_/nskx8wx/)
- Lacks the phones and emails that big databases like ZoomInfo collect from customer CRMs, so coverage trails them [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/1i3mzs0/_/m8edysy/)

**Best for:** Budget teams running their own enrichment waterfall; Finding work emails and mobiles for contacts scraped from Apollo or LinkedIn; A second-pass check on unknown or failed emails.
**Skip it if:** Teams that need ZoomInfo-level coverage from one source; Senders who cannot add a separate catch-all verifier.
**Pricing (vendor-stated, checked 2026-10-14):** Essential is $99/mo billed monthly for 5,000 credits, or $990/yr (about $83/mo); tiers run up to Ultimate at $849/mo for 100,000 credits, with Enterprise from $2,490/quarter. No free plan or free credits; a paid plan is required at signup, and failed lookups cost nothing.

Full review: https://gtmranked.com/tools/leadmagic/

## #14 Seamless.AI

Seamless.AI is a B2B contact data platform that finds emails, cell phones and direct dials, with a Chrome extension, CRM enrichment, buyer-intent and job-change data, and built-in outreach tools. Website: seamless.ai. Category: [B2B Data & Enrichment](https://gtmranked.com/best/b2b-data-enrichment/). Score 13/100 (3 positive, 4 mixed, 10 negative of 17 independent comments).

**Verdict:** Independent users are largely negative: the most common reports are inaccurate data (guessed email patterns, wrong phone numbers, bounce rates near 20%), annual contracts that are hard to exit, and aggressive sales follow-up. A minority, mostly in 2023 to 2026 comments, rate the data as good enough to replace ZoomInfo at a fraction of the price, so data quality is contested rather than settled. The corpus shows no promotional seeding, but much of it is older r/sales discussion from 2022 and 2023.

**What users like:**
- Some users rate the data as comparable to ZoomInfo at a far lower price; one cut their annual spend by about $16k after switching [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/1k0rrmq/_/mnm3uou/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/agency/comments/1pzieop/_/nx74fd7/)
- Users who stick with it find it worth the money for finding mobile numbers, and the free trial plus referral credits let reps test it first [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/LeadGeneration/comments/1df56w8/_/lx06z6v/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/17w7rit/_/k9jo08k/)

**What users complain about:**
- Data accuracy is the main complaint: emails guessed from naming conventions, wrong phone numbers, and one two-year customer reporting 18 to 23% bounce rates [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/wt9v9r/_/il31kuf/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/wt9v9r/_/il58oqk/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/LeadGeneration/comments/1df56w8/_/lgx7729/) [4](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/10y4b7d/_/j8054ny/) [5](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/wt9v9r/_/ilplxog/)
- Annual contracts with no cancellation; buyers describe being unable to exit and continuing to receive bills [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/10fgs1h/_/j6jj117/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/10fgs1h/_/j4ypn1l/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/1lldaph/_/n02exsa/)
- Aggressive sales outreach and weak support once the deal is signed; one person says the company cold called them about 20 times after removal requests [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/10fgs1h/_/j6jj117/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/wt9v9r/_/il6te1j/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/wt9v9r/_/il31kuf/) [4](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/10fgs1h/_/j4xrokv/)
- Teams that tested it against ZoomInfo went back to ZoomInfo, citing more accurate and thorough data [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/wt9v9r/_/il31kuf/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/wt9v9r/_/il4bjmt/)
- Pricey for an individual rep; one user who likes it for mobile numbers balks at about $1,300 a year [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/LeadGeneration/comments/1df56w8/_/lx06z6v/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/10fgs1h/_/j6jj117/)

**Best for:** Budget-conscious reps who want a cheaper alternative to ZoomInfo and will verify data themselves.
**Skip it if:** Teams that cannot absorb a hard-to-cancel annual contract; Buyers who need dependable email accuracy without separate verification.
**Pricing (vendor-stated, checked 2026-10-14):** Sales-led pricing; no public plan prices. The pricing page asks how many contacts you need per month and your company size before quoting, and offers free sign-up and competitor switch discounts.

Full review: https://gtmranked.com/tools/seamless-ai/