# LeadMagic vs Prospeo

Updated 2026-10-15. Compared from independent Reddit comments only. Methodology: https://gtmranked.com/methodology/

**Is LeadMagic or Prospeo better?** Independent users prefer LeadMagic (68/100 from 21 rated comments) over Prospeo (12/100 from 9 rated comments). LeadMagic is best for Budget teams running their own enrichment waterfall; Prospeo is best for Teams that will test it as one source alongside other finders.

**Is LeadMagic or Prospeo cheaper?** LeadMagic: Essential is $99/mo billed monthly for 5,000 credits, or $990/yr (about $83/mo); tiers run up to Ultimate at $849/mo for 100,000 credits, with Enterprise from $2,490/quarter. No free plan or free credits; a paid plan is required at signup, and failed lookups cost nothing. Prospeo: Free plan with 100 credits a month. Paid plans are per user: Starter $49/mo monthly or $37/mo billed yearly (2,000 credits/mo), Growth $99 or $74 (5,000 credits/mo), Pro $249 or $187 (15,000 credits/mo). Yearly billing saves 25% and delivers credits upfront; larger credit volumes go through sales. Prices are from each vendor's pricing page and change often.

| | LeadMagic | Prospeo |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 12/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 | #15 |
| Rated comments | 21 | 9 |
| Best for | Budget teams running their own enrichment waterfall; Finding work emails and mobiles for contacts scraped from Apollo or LinkedIn; A second-pass check on unknown or failed emails | Teams that will test it as one source alongside other finders |
| Starting price | $83/mo | $37/user/mo |

## #1 LeadMagic

LeadMagic sells verified B2B contact and company data, including work emails, email validation and mobile numbers, through an app, API, CLI and MCP server that draw on one shared credit pool. Website: leadmagic.io. Category: [B2B Data & Enrichment](https://gtmranked.com/best/b2b-data-enrichment/). Score 68/100 (18 positive, 1 mixed, 2 negative of 21 independent comments).

**Verdict:** Independent users describe LeadMagic as a cheap, pay-as-you-go email and mobile finder that slots into a waterfall, usually alongside Apollo or inside Clay, and that also works as a second-pass verifier. About 21 non-promotional comments carry an opinion, mostly brief and positive, centred on price and on finding emails and phones Apollo misses. The criticism is thinner but specific: one user says it has been failing them lately, and its handling of catch-all addresses is contested, with one user calling its 'valid catch-all' results unreliable and another praising its catch-all marking. Promotional comments are a smaller share than for most tools here, mostly plugs for other scrapers and verifiers plus a same-day cluster of Prospeo plugs, one of which knocks its mobile numbers.

**What users like:**
- Cheap and pay-as-you-go; users call it the low-cost option for volume, one putting it at a tenth of Apollo's cost [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/b2bmarketing/comments/1vfjjaq/_/p1qkvxy/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1l3tk3b/_/mwjuxsq/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/1i3mzs0/_/m8edysy/) [4](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/1khzwhh/_/mrb450g/)
- Finds emails other sources miss, such as a contact's new address after a job change when Apollo still had the old one [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1qq6vlu/_/o3l2d1u/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/LeadGeneration/comments/1k4bcll/_/mogv1i6/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1juuhec/_/mnkcour/)
- Used for mobile numbers too, with users reporting better mobile coverage than Apollo [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/salesdevelopment/comments/1hwe6np/_/m60z2p9/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/LeadGeneration/comments/1jx9yi1/_/mnha5sa/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaaS/comments/1eftatb/_/lfs1x9m/)
- Doubles as a verifier: users run it as a second pass on unknown emails, then use its finder to replace invalid ones [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/b2bmarketing/comments/1v8vyp3/_/p128ive/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1heeei7/_/m230nqt/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1juuhec/_/mnkcour/)
- Plugs easily into Clay and other waterfall setups for LinkedIn-sourced contacts [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1qq6vlu/_/o3l2d1u/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1rl8ljj/_/obzdqu4/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1o4u2vi/_/njhbovf/)

**What users complain about:**
- One user says it charges for 'valid catch-all' results that are not reliable, forcing either lower coverage or a separate catch-all verifier (another user disputes this and praises its catch-all marking) [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/LeadGeneration/comments/1k4bcll/_/momkk72/)
- Consistency is questioned: one user says it has been failing them recently [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1pfmgrr/_/nskx8wx/)
- Lacks the phones and emails that big databases like ZoomInfo collect from customer CRMs, so coverage trails them [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/1i3mzs0/_/m8edysy/)

**Best for:** Budget teams running their own enrichment waterfall; Finding work emails and mobiles for contacts scraped from Apollo or LinkedIn; A second-pass check on unknown or failed emails.
**Skip it if:** Teams that need ZoomInfo-level coverage from one source; Senders who cannot add a separate catch-all verifier.
**Pricing (vendor-stated, checked 2026-10-14):** Essential is $99/mo billed monthly for 5,000 credits, or $990/yr (about $83/mo); tiers run up to Ultimate at $849/mo for 100,000 credits, with Enterprise from $2,490/quarter. No free plan or free credits; a paid plan is required at signup, and failed lookups cost nothing.

Full review: https://gtmranked.com/tools/leadmagic/

## #15 Prospeo

Prospeo is a B2B contact and company data platform that provides verified emails, phone numbers and firmographic search through a web app, Chrome extension and API. Website: prospeo.io. Category: [B2B Data & Enrichment](https://gtmranked.com/best/b2b-data-enrichment/). Score 12/100 (3 positive, 0 mixed, 6 negative of 9 independent comments).

**Verdict:** Most of the Prospeo discussion on Reddit is promotional: a large cluster of 'switched from ZoomInfo/Apollo/Lusha and bounces dropped' stories repeats the same talking points (connect rates, weekly refresh, pay only for verified), includes word-for-word duplicate comments from different accounts, and several users openly accuse the company of posting from fake accounts. Set that aside and independent evidence is thin and split: a few users rate it well as one source in a multi-tool stack, while others report a refund dispute or say it did not solve their data problem.

**What users like:**
- Holds up in multi-source stacks: one team uses it as its main email and mobile source, another gets better verified-email results stacking it with a bounce check [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaaS/comments/1r1r54w/_/o5mtycf/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaaS/comments/1se4hzt/_/of5pvtj/)

**What users complain about:**
- One user says a changed login method locked them out, the cancellation was not processed in time, and support refused a refund [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/CRM/comments/1hsn017/_/n4hvun3/)
- Several users accuse Prospeo of promoting itself on Reddit through fake or planted accounts, which makes much of the public praise hard to trust [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/MarketingAutomation/comments/1tx9x3w/_/oqbiujg/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/CRM/comments/1t9ib22/_/om3nn0w/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/CRM/comments/1t9ib22/_/oljcgnf/)

**Best for:** Teams that will test it as one source alongside other finders.
**Skip it if:** Buyers who want to rely on Reddit testimonials to judge accuracy.
**Pricing (vendor-stated, checked 2026-10-14):** Free plan with 100 credits a month. Paid plans are per user: Starter $49/mo monthly or $37/mo billed yearly (2,000 credits/mo), Growth $99 or $74 (5,000 credits/mo), Pro $249 or $187 (15,000 credits/mo). Yearly billing saves 25% and delivers credits upfront; larger credit volumes go through sales.

Full review: https://gtmranked.com/tools/prospeo/