# Findymail vs Wiza

Updated 2026-10-15. Compared from independent Reddit comments only. Methodology: https://gtmranked.com/methodology/

**Is Findymail or Wiza better?** Independent users prefer Findymail (43/100 from 12 rated comments) over Wiza (32/100 from 21 rated comments). Findymail is best for Teams stacking several email finders behind a bounce check; Wiza is best for Turning LinkedIn and Sales Navigator lists into emails.

**Is Findymail or Wiza cheaper?** Findymail: Starter is $99/mo for 5,000 finder credits plus 5,000 verifier credits; yearly billing is advertised as two months free, and higher volumes and Enterprise are custom. A free account gets 10 credits with no card. One email costs 1 credit and one phone 10; nothing is charged when no result is found. Datacare CRM enrichment starts at $500/mo billed annually. Wiza: Free plan with 20 emails and 5 phone numbers. Monthly plans per user: Starter $49, Email $99, Email + Phone $199, with per-reveal overage fees. Annual plans with unlimited reveals: Email $83/mo ($990/yr) and Email + Phone $166/mo ($1,990/yr) per user. Team plan (3+ users) is custom and annual. Prices are from each vendor's pricing page and change often.

| | Findymail | Wiza |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 32/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 | #8 |
| Rated comments | 12 | 21 |
| Best for | Teams stacking several email finders behind a bounce check; Clay users who want an email finder as a native action | Turning LinkedIn and Sales Navigator lists into emails; Solo sellers replacing ZoomInfo or Lusha on a budget; Teams using it as one source inside a Clay stack |
| Starting price | $99/mo | $49/user/mo |

## #5 Findymail

Findymail finds and verifies B2B email addresses and phone numbers, and sells a separate Datacare service that enriches and cleans CRM records. Website: findymail.com. Category: [B2B Data & Enrichment](https://gtmranked.com/best/b2b-data-enrichment/). Score 43/100 (7 positive, 3 mixed, 2 negative of 12 independent comments).

**Verdict:** Independent discussion is thin: about 12 non-promotional comments carry an opinion, most of them brief. Those users rate Findymail as a cleaner, more accurate email source than broad databases like Apollo, often stacked with other finders or run inside Clay, but it is called expensive at volume, its monthly credits expire, and one user's campaigns were auto-paused for bounces on its emails. Roughly two thirds of the comments are promotional: a wave of short 2026 posts from different accounts repeats the same lines ('wins by far', 'under 2% bounce, no need to verify', 'AI lead finder'), and six of them hide invisible characters inside the brand name. Treat the enthusiasm on Reddit with real caution.

**What users like:**
- Users who stack it with other finders and a bounce check say it returns cleaner emails than broad databases [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaaS/comments/1se4hzt/_/of5pvtj/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1snhacv/_/oglqizu/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaaS/comments/1ug6j1g/_/otyy8tq/)
- Runs as a native action inside Clay and is one of the smaller providers Clay itself draws on, which users rate as surprisingly good [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaaS/comments/1ltpbjo/_/onxr977/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales_intelligence/comments/1rp8c4b/_/omiwn67/)
- Seen as strongest at finding emails rather than only verifying them, with one user reporting it handles catch-all addresses well [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1id84wf/_/ma1hkr5/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/LeadGeneration/comments/1tujb6f/_/oqjhncs/)

**What users complain about:**
- Pricey for large lists: one comparison calls it the most expensive option and too costly to use only for verification, and credits must be used within the month [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1id84wf/_/ma1hkr5/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/LeadGeneration/comments/1fz5x2u/_/lr0af2i/)
- Not bounce-proof: one user's Instantly campaigns were auto-paused for bounces on emails it found [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1kd09t2/_/mqfbtwe/)
- Not a shortcut: users note it relies on the same kind of underlying data as other finders, so results still hinge on verification, warmup and list hygiene [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/agency/comments/1pzieop/_/nwv7zgg/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/salesdevelopment/comments/1izbgrx/_/mf2inoc/)

**Best for:** Teams stacking several email finders behind a bounce check; Clay users who want an email finder as a native action.
**Skip it if:** High-volume senders on a tight budget; Buyers wanting broad, independent proof of accuracy at scale.
**Pricing (vendor-stated, checked 2026-10-14):** Starter is $99/mo for 5,000 finder credits plus 5,000 verifier credits; yearly billing is advertised as two months free, and higher volumes and Enterprise are custom. A free account gets 10 credits with no card. One email costs 1 credit and one phone 10; nothing is charged when no result is found. Datacare CRM enrichment starts at $500/mo billed annually.

Full review: https://gtmranked.com/tools/findymail/

## #8 Wiza

Wiza is a prospecting tool that finds verified email addresses and phone numbers for contacts, including from LinkedIn, with CRM integrations and API access on team plans. Website: wiza.co. Category: [B2B Data & Enrichment](https://gtmranked.com/best/b2b-data-enrichment/). Score 32/100 (8 positive, 6 mixed, 7 negative of 21 independent comments).

**Verdict:** About half of the 100 Reddit comments mentioning Wiza were promotional, including a cluster of accounts in early 2025 repeating the same Sales Navigator talking points and many comments plugging rival tools, so those are excluded. Among roughly 20 independent opinions, Wiza is seen as a sensible way to turn LinkedIn and Sales Navigator lists into emails, and a few users report lower bounce rates or better hit rates than Apollo, ZoomInfo or Lusha. The trade-off is cost and consistency: several users call email accuracy hit or miss, others say credits get expensive at volume, and waterfall tools reportedly find more contacts, especially mobile numbers.

**What users like:**
- A natural fit when LinkedIn or Sales Navigator is the main prospect source [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/EmailProspecting/comments/1s460a4/_/ocuqzjp/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/EmailProspecting/comments/1s460a4/_/ocn5otv/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/b2bmarketing/comments/1lj7r35/_/n04dgjj/)
- Some users report the lowest bounce rate among tools they tested, or a better hit rate than ZoomInfo, Lusha or Apollo [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaaS/comments/1wbasek/_/p8u3pqb/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/salesdevelopment/comments/1ruj42x/_/oaom2cd/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/1r4bpf7/_/o5dcp5a/)
- Much cheaper than paying for ZoomInfo when you are a solo seller [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/salesdevelopment/comments/1ruj42x/_/oaom2cd/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/salesdevelopment/comments/1ruj42x/_/oc0ym0u/)
- Holds up as one data source in a Clay-based stack [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/gtmengineering/comments/1wjqc2o/_/patju4d/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/b2bmarketing/comments/1lj7r35/_/n04dgjj/)

**What users complain about:**
- Email accuracy is inconsistent: users report hit-or-miss results, bouncing emails, and addresses at companies the prospect no longer works for [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1o6x8ay/_/njn4wdc/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/1l8tnnh/_/n8zp0f7/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1kidtko/_/mu50qgm/) [4](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1pfmgrr/_/nti82na/)
- Gets expensive at volume: credits cost more per contact than Findymail, and pulling thousands of verified emails at once adds up [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1p9opd5/_/nrpe3sw/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/b2bmarketing/comments/1pi3nwc/_/nt4mpi4/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/coldemail/comments/1mjb5sz/_/n7cvahn/)
- Waterfall tools that query many providers find more contacts, and reportedly hit better on mobile numbers [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/EmailProspecting/comments/1s460a4/_/ocn5otv/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/EmailProspecting/comments/1s460a4/_/ocuqzjp/)
- Its own prospect database is seen as static profile data that lags LinkedIn [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/LeadGeneration/comments/1kzrclf/_/mvqfm28/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/salesdevelopment/comments/1ruj42x/_/oc0ym0u/)
- One team found the app so slow it was borderline unusable, and a recruiter warns that using it against LinkedIn risks an account ban [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/1l8tnnh/_/n8zp0f7/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/recruiting/comments/1jxwu6w/_/mmtxrm7/)

**Best for:** Turning LinkedIn and Sales Navigator lists into emails; Solo sellers replacing ZoomInfo or Lusha on a budget; Teams using it as one source inside a Clay stack.
**Skip it if:** High-volume teams watching cost per contact; Cold-calling teams that need the best mobile number coverage.
**Pricing (vendor-stated, checked 2026-10-14):** Free plan with 20 emails and 5 phone numbers. Monthly plans per user: Starter $49, Email $99, Email + Phone $199, with per-reveal overage fees. Annual plans with unlimited reveals: Email $83/mo ($990/yr) and Email + Phone $166/mo ($1,990/yr) per user. Team plan (3+ users) is custom and annual.

Full review: https://gtmranked.com/tools/wiza/