# Avoma vs Granola

Updated 2026-10-15. Compared from independent Reddit comments only. Methodology: https://gtmranked.com/methodology/

**Is Avoma or Granola better?** Independent users prefer Granola (73/100 from 33 rated comments) over Avoma (51/100 from 9 rated comments). Granola is best for People in back-to-back meetings who want notes without a bot joining the call; Avoma is best for Small and mid-size sales teams that want Gong-style call recording at a lower price.

**Is Avoma or Granola cheaper?** Avoma: Per recording seat: Startup $19/mo billed annually ($29 monthly, up to 25 seats), Organization $29/mo annually ($39 monthly), Enterprise $39/mo billed annually only (10-seat minimum). Conversation Intelligence and Revenue Intelligence add-ons are $29/seat/mo each annually; viewers are free. 14-day free trial of the Organization plan, no credit card. Granola: Free Basic plan ($0, 30-day meeting history, limited AI chat and integrations). Business is $14/user/mo with unlimited history, API and integrations; Enterprise is $35/user/mo with SSO, SCIM and admin controls. The page does not state monthly vs annual billing. Prices are from each vendor's pricing page and change often.

| | Avoma | Granola |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 | #1 |
| Rated comments | 9 | 33 |
| Best for | Small and mid-size sales teams that want Gong-style call recording at a lower price; Managers who score and review rep calls with scorecards; Reps who want call notes generated from their own templates | People in back-to-back meetings who want notes without a bot joining the call; External or in-person meetings where you don't control the call platform; Users who want to steer notes with their own jottings or prompts and query them later |
| Starting price | $19/mo | $14/user/mo |

## #4 Avoma

Avoma is an AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes and summarizes meetings, with paid add-ons for conversation intelligence (call scoring), revenue intelligence and lead routing. Website: avoma.com. Category: [Call Recording & Notetakers](https://gtmranked.com/best/conversation-intelligence/). Score 51/100 (7 positive, 1 mixed, 1 negative of 9 independent comments).

**Verdict:** Independent discussion is thin: about nine non-promotional comments carry a real opinion, mostly short notes from sales and RevOps users. Those users treat Avoma as a cheaper Gong or Chorus substitute that covers the basics well: recordings, searchable transcripts, template-based notes and call scorecards. The main complaints are the overall product and support quality, voiced by one team that still keeps it for transcription and scoring, and a preference for Granola among another team. Seven of 23 comments were promotional, mostly plugs for other notetakers, Reddit-monitoring tools or Avoma itself with a feature list and link.

**What users like:**
- Users pick it as a cheaper alternative to Gong and Chorus that still covers the basics; one rep who has used all three calls it their go-to low-cost option [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/1ge9do7/_/lu9cyea/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/salesdevelopment/comments/1l6ciok/_/mwsvk30/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/1nnoo71/_/nfmhlhv/) [4](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaaS/comments/1if1ucx/_/macjnbz/)
- Recordings, searchable transcripts and actionable summaries are rated well; one RevOps user calls it the best meeting transcription tool they have used [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/1ge9do7/_/lua9jpy/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/revops/comments/1l55hyy/_/mxgh5z9/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/1nnoo71/_/nfmhlhv/) [4](https://www.reddit.com/r/salesdevelopment/comments/1rrqs7a/_/oa6mobg/)
- Call scorecards help managers check that reps follow the playbook, and one team says the scoring is accurate [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/salesdevelopment/comments/1rrqs7a/_/oa6mobg/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/salesdevelopment/comments/1l6ciok/_/mwsvk30/)
- Notes can be generated from your own templates, which one sales user prefers over Gemini's built-in Google Meet notes [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/1v3fox6/_/oz3jwkw/)

**What users complain about:**
- One team that keeps it for transcription and scoring calls the rest of the tool poor and its support awful [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/salesdevelopment/comments/1rrqs7a/_/oa6mobg/)
- One small-business team found Granola much better than Avoma for AI notes [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/smallbusiness/comments/1ja7bd9/_/mhncfhp/)

**Best for:** Small and mid-size sales teams that want Gong-style call recording at a lower price; Managers who score and review rep calls with scorecards; Reps who want call notes generated from their own templates.
**Skip it if:** Teams that need responsive vendor support.
**Pricing (vendor-stated, checked 2026-10-15):** Per recording seat: Startup $19/mo billed annually ($29 monthly, up to 25 seats), Organization $29/mo annually ($39 monthly), Enterprise $39/mo billed annually only (10-seat minimum). Conversation Intelligence and Revenue Intelligence add-ons are $29/seat/mo each annually; viewers are free. 14-day free trial of the Organization plan, no credit card.

Full review: https://gtmranked.com/tools/avoma/

## #1 Granola

Granola is an AI notepad for meetings that transcribes calls and turns them, together with the user's own notes, into meeting notes that can be searched and queried later. Website: granola.ai. Category: [Call Recording & Notetakers](https://gtmranked.com/best/conversation-intelligence/). Score 73/100 (28 positive, 2 mixed, 3 negative of 33 independent comments).

**Verdict:** Independent users, mostly product managers and salespeople, are strongly positive: they like that no bot joins the call, that it frees them to listen instead of typing, and several rate its notes above the built-in Zoom, Teams, Copilot and Gong summaries, with some paying for it themselves. The recurring weakness is attribution and fidelity: users say it is poor at labelling who said what, one sales team calls its transcripts really bad, and one PM found its summaries compress away detail. Promotional comments were a small minority, mostly rival note-takers pitching their own product.

**What users like:**
- No bot joins the meeting: it captures audio on your device, and users also use it for in-person meetings [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/ProductManagement/comments/1kombc5/_/msria1w/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/consulting/comments/1l13hss/_/mvigf9o/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/ProductManagement/comments/1nw2k5p/_/nhcw9md/) [4](https://www.reddit.com/r/productivity/comments/1qdk2yh/_/nzr967b/) [5](https://www.reddit.com/r/consulting/comments/1wz6pkv/_/pebng7k/)
- Users rate its transcripts and notes above built-in options: better than Teams, Copilot, Zoom and Meet notes, and than Gong's AI summaries [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/projectmanagement/comments/1w0383c/_/p6ahqg8/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaaS/comments/1w0v5lh/_/p6ghxc9/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/1j5vhhj/_/mgl134d/) [4](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/1qxtspo/_/o4ewf8u/)
- Lets users listen instead of typing during calls; several call it a big time saver and one seller pays the $15 a month out of pocket [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/1q8khn6/_/nyoa49a/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/ProductManagement/comments/1hgnxt9/_/m2m2rka/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/ProductManagement/comments/1rhmm9f/_/o7ztnoq/) [4](https://www.reddit.com/r/productivity/comments/1h5ihrd/_/m068uhc/) [5](https://www.reddit.com/r/ProductManagement/comments/1pon8bt/_/nugjd6e/)
- Merges the user's own typed notes with the transcript, lets them prompt how notes are reshaped, and answers questions across past meetings [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/consulting/comments/1l13hss/_/mvigf9o/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/startups/comments/1s6sljj/_/od4piv5/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/productivity/comments/1o55phd/_/nj7cp1i/) [4](https://www.reddit.com/r/ProductManagement/comments/1n3zk8d/_/nbh7t2t/)
- Detects meetings on its own and prompts to record, and learns which folder new notes belong in [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/ProductManagement/comments/1nw2k5p/_/nhcw9md/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/startups/comments/1s6sljj/_/od4piv5/)

**What users complain about:**
- Weak at labelling who said what, which users say costs context; one sales team goes further and calls its transcripts really bad [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/remotework/comments/1tiioah/_/omux9xn/) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/1w3imng/_/p73qx4m/) [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/sales/comments/1w3imng/_/p73qgh0/)
- Summaries compress away detail: one PM found follow-up work in Claude missed edge cases that were only in the full transcript [1](https://www.reddit.com/r/ProductManagement/comments/1wvnl4v/_/pdddhpg/)

**Best for:** People in back-to-back meetings who want notes without a bot joining the call; External or in-person meetings where you don't control the call platform; Users who want to steer notes with their own jottings or prompts and query them later.
**Skip it if:** Teams that need accurate who-said-what attribution in transcripts.
**Pricing (vendor-stated, checked 2026-10-14):** Free Basic plan ($0, 30-day meeting history, limited AI chat and integrations). Business is $14/user/mo with unlimited history, API and integrations; Enterprise is $35/user/mo with SSO, SCIM and admin controls. The page does not state monthly vs annual billing.

Full review: https://gtmranked.com/tools/granola/